Certified Clinical Research Associate (CCRA) Practice Exam 2025 – Complete Preparation Guide

Question: 1 / 400

If a deviation is made to eliminate an immediate hazard, the investigator should ensure that it is?

Kept confidential

Documented and rationales are submitted

When an investigator makes a deviation to eliminate an immediate hazard, it is crucial to ensure that it is documented and that rationales for the deviation are submitted. This is important for several reasons:

1. **Accountability**: Documentation provides a clear record of the decision-making process, allowing for accountability. It enables others to understand why the deviation was necessary and the specific circumstances that led to it.

2. **Regulatory Compliance**: Research regulations often require that deviations be documented to maintain compliance with ethical guidelines and institutional policies. This helps demonstrate that the investigator acted responsibly and with the safety of participants as a priority.

3. **Transparency**: Submitting rationales with documentation enhances transparency in the research process, fostering trust amongst stakeholders, including study participants, ethics committees, and regulatory bodies.

4. **Future Reference**: Detailed records of deviations are important for future audits, oversight, and reviews. They help in identifying patterns that could indicate a need for systemic changes in protocols or practices.

In contrast, keeping the information confidential, declaring it public knowledge, or discussing it privately does not provide the necessary transparency and accountability required in research settings. Hence, comprehensive documentation alongside a clear rationale is fundamental whenever deviations are made for safety reasons.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Declared public knowledge

Discussed privately with the study team

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy